July 30 marked the beginning of another migration crisis at Europe’s borders. That day, around 72,000 people attempted to reach Ceuta, a Spanish city on the northern coast of Africa, by swimming across the sea from Morocco. The scale of the movement, and the fact that thousands of people attempted the crossing by water at the same time, quickly drew attention to the episode.
In Spain, some officials and commentators attributed the recent increase in migration to a ruling by the Spanish Supreme Court. Three weeks earlier, the court had determined that migrants intercepted at sea while attempting to reach Ceuta or Melilla could not be immediately returned to Morocco.
On Thursday (July 30), Spain’s Interior Ministry accused human trafficking networks of “instrumentalizing” the ruling to encourage undocumented migrants to travel to Ceuta. The ministry also announced an agreement with Morocco to strengthen coordination between the two countries and speed up the return of migrants who entered Spain irregularly.
The crisis that reignited the debate
Ceuta’s strategic location has made it one of the main entry points into Europe for migrants and asylum seekers. Along with Melilla, Ceuta is one of two Spanish enclaves on the North African coast, geographically separated from mainland Spain and surrounded by Moroccan territory. Their unique position makes both cities key — and highly contested — border zones between Africa and Europe.
This was not the first time Spain had faced a large-scale migration crisis at these borders. Authorities and residents in Ceuta and Melilla have become accustomed to sudden waves of people attempting to enter the cities, often in large groups and over a short period. However, the latest episode stood out for the sheer scale of the movement and the number of people who attempted the dangerous crossing by sea.
The circumstances behind the mass crossing remain unclear. After Spain’s Supreme Court upheld a legal exception concerning the immediate return of migrants arriving by sea, groups in Morocco reportedly organized coordinated crossings. The development fueled speculation that Moroccan authorities may have encouraged or, at least, tolerated the movement.
The Moroccan government denied those allegations. Instead, officials attributed the crisis to misinformation spread online and to human trafficking networks operating in the country.
The episode in Ceuta, however, raises a broader question: if similar crises continue to emerge at different points along Europe’s borders, what does this reveal about the continent’s unresolved approach to migration, asylum, and refugee protection?
Ceuta is not an isolated case
Those who swam from Morocco to reach Ceuta are just one of many groups attempting to enter Europe. They used the Western Mediterranean route, which connects Morocco and Algeria to Spain across the Mediterranean Sea. It is the only major route that has recorded an increase in recent years, with 19,403 crossings in 2025, 14% more than in 2024. Between January and July 2026, 11,537 crossings were recorded, mainly involving citizens of Algeria, Morocco and Mali, according to Frontex.
However, these figures do not yet include the approximately 70,000 people who attempted to reach Ceuta at the end of July. Frontex said the data on the episode is still being consolidated and validated.
Morocco is also connected to the West African route, which leads from northwestern Africa across the Atlantic to Spain’s Canary Islands. Between January and July 2026, 4,682 crossings were recorded, mainly involving citizens of Senegal, Gambia and Morocco. The same route is often used by people fleeing instability in the Sahel, particularly its central region, which includes Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger.
These three countries are facing a severe humanitarian crisis driven by political instability, insecurity and economic difficulties. Their colonial history also remains relevant, as critics argue that France’s continued influence has maintained forms of economic dependence.
Insecurity has further worsened the situation. Terrorist groups have expanded in the region, while Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger have made combating terrorism a central focus of their military strategies. Political and social pressures also persist, including restrictions on same-sex relationships in Burkina Faso approved in 2025.
The climate crisis adds another layer of pressure, with temperatures rising at around 1.5 times the global average and worsening conflicts over scarce resources.
Together, these factors have contributed to large-scale displacement: more than half a million people have fled the three countries as refugees, while millions more remain displaced internally.
Why do people keep leaving?
The Eastern Mediterranean route, meanwhile, connects the Middle East and North Africa to destinations such as Greece and Cyprus. It has been the most frequently used route so far in 2026, with more than 20,000 irregular crossings recorded between January and July.
The Syrian refugee crisis has been one of the most emblematic cases of mass displacement in Europe over the past decade. Since the civil war began in 2011, millions of Syrians have been displaced, with most initially seeking refuge in neighboring countries such as Türkiye, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq and Egypt.
The crisis became particularly visible in Europe in 2015, when large numbers of Syrians and people from other countries crossed the Mediterranean in small boats. Many departed from Türkiye toward Greece, while others traveled from North Africa toward Italy and Spain.
By the same route used by many Syrians, migrants from Afghanistan, Sudan, Bangladesh and Egypt also travel through the Eastern Mediterranean route. They often leave the Middle East and North Africa, heading toward Cyprus and Greece.
Another major route is the Central Mediterranean, traditionally one of the busiest ways into Europe. In 2025, it recorded 66,328 irregular crossings, compared with 162,714 in 2023. Between January and July 2026, there were 16,454 crossings, mainly involving citizens of Bangladesh, Somalia, Algeria, Sudan and Pakistan. Most journeys are made by sea, often in overcrowded boats, making the route particularly dangerous. Shipwrecks and deaths are frequent.
Finally, the Eastern Borders route shows a different pattern of displacement. Between January and July 2026, 3,209 crossings were recorded, with Ukrainians accounting for 94% of them. The route connects Eastern Europe to countries such as Poland and Finland and is primarily a land route.
The war in Ukraine has created one of the largest refugee movements in Europe in recent decades. The conflict began in 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea and fighting broke out in eastern Ukraine, but escalated dramatically on February 24, 2022, when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of the country. The war destroyed homes and infrastructure and forced millions of people to leave their communities.
Most Ukrainians who fled the country initially moved to neighboring European countries, including Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania. Their movement was largely different from the irregular crossings seen in the Mediterranean: Ukrainians were able to cross land borders and benefit from temporary protection arrangements in the European Union, allowing them to live and work in member states without immediately applying for asylum.
Not everyone arriving in Europe is a refugee
Taken together, these cases show that different groups migrate with different profiles and legal situations — refugees, asylum seekers and irregular migrants, for different reasons. These may include humanitarian crises, natural disasters, wars, political, religious or ethnic persecution, economic instability or political instability in their countries of origin.
They also travel through different routes, but often share the same urge: to find a safe place to stay, one that might eventually become home.
From migration policy to border control
The episode in Ceuta pushed the European Union to call for the “full” implementation of its new migration policies and for a stronger common response, including increased border surveillance and better prevention systems. The bloc now has more tools to control irregular migration than ever before, including faster returns, a stronger role for Frontex and closer cooperation with countries outside the EU.
However, the European response has also become increasingly focused on migration as a matter of security. Since 2015, disagreements over how to deal with asylum seekers have exposed deep divisions between EU member states. These tensions were reinforced by episodes such as the 2021 crisis in Ceuta, when Morocco facilitated the arrival of thousands of people during a diplomatic dispute with Spain, and the movement of migrants toward Poland, Lithuania and Latvia through Belarus.
After years of negotiations, the EU approved the Pact on Migration and Asylum in 2024, which entered into application in June 2026. Among other measures, it establishes faster border procedures and a solidarity mechanism between member states. The new rules also allow people with final expulsion decisions to be sent to centers in third countries, as long as agreements exist and certain safeguards are met. Critics argue that this represents a further externalization of European migration policy and raises concerns about the treatment and protection of migrants outside EU territory.
At the same time, the political debate around migration has become increasingly restrictive. The 2024 European elections marked the advance of conservative and far-right forces, while several traditionally center-left parties have also hardened their positions on migration. As a result, migration is increasingly presented as a matter of national security, rather than as a challenge of governance and humanitarian protection.
The EU has also expanded its cooperation with countries outside the bloc, effectively turning them into “gatekeepers” of European borders. Since the mid-2000s, agreements have been established with countries such as Türkiye, Morocco, Tunisia, Libya, Mauritania and Senegal to reduce migration before people reach European territory. This strategy, however, creates a form of political dependence: when diplomatic relations deteriorate, or countries have their own strategic interests, migration control can become a tool of negotiation, as seen in Ceuta.
The situation also reveals a contradiction within Europe itself. While the EU seeks greater control over its external borders, countries such as France, Germany and Austria have reinstated internal border controls within the Schengen Area, despite these measures being officially considered exceptional and temporary.
The question, then, is not simply whether Europe has enough tools to control migration. It is whether these tools actually address the reasons why people continue to migrate — or simply push them toward different routes and make their journeys more dangerous. The Ceuta crisis shows how difficult it is to separate migration from security, diplomacy and domestic politics, while also raising questions about how much responsibility Europe is willing to take for people seeking protection at its borders.
So, what is still missing?
If Europe wants to address migration beyond border control, it also needs to expand safe and legal pathways for people seeking protection, make asylum procedures more efficient and improve reception conditions. A more balanced distribution of responsibility among EU countries would also prevent countries at the bloc’s external borders from carrying most of the pressure.
At the same time, fighting human trafficking networks should not mean treating migrants themselves as a security threat. Integration also needs to be part of the response, while European policies should address the conflicts, instability and other conditions that force people to leave their homes in the first place.
The question, however, is not only what Europe can do, but how willing its countries are to share the responsibility. As migration has become increasingly connected to security and domestic politics, cooperation between member states remains one of the main challenges.
Ceuta as a symptom, not an exception
The episode in Ceuta is not an isolated crisis. Syria, the Sahel, Ukraine and Ceuta represent different realities, different reasons for migration and different routes into Europe, but they all expose the same unresolved challenge: how should Europe respond to people seeking a safer place to live?
For years, European migration policies have focused increasingly on strengthening borders, preventing irregular arrivals and returning those who enter without authorization. But, as long as the response remains concentrated on keeping people out, new routes and new crises are likely to emerge.
Ceuta therefore reflects a broader contradiction in Europe’s migration policy. The continent presents itself as a space built around the protection of human rights, yet many of the people arriving in search of that protection encounter increasingly restrictive borders, dangerous journeys and policies focused more on control than on protection.
————————————————–
The article above was edited by Isabelle Bignardi.
Liked this type of content? Check Her Campus Cásper Líbero home page for more!