Her Campus Logo Her Campus Logo
UPRM | Culture > Entertainment

The Era of Remakes and Sequels: Has Nostalgia Replaced Creativity?

Naimarys Barbot Student Contributor, University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez
This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at UPRM chapter and does not reflect the views of Her Campus.

I’ve heard it said that 2026 has been the golden year for cinema. With movies like The Devil Wears Prada 2, The Odyssey, and Spider-Man: Brand New Day, viewers have flocked to theaters, causing box office numbers to spike rather than rise steadily as usual. While no amount of critique can take away from the fact that these movies are thoroughly enjoyable, I have to admit they all feel dipped in nostalgia and not much else. 

How to Train Your Dragon, Scream 7, The Super Mario Galaxy Movie, Toy Story 5… We’ve seen it all before. At first, it was exciting when a sequel or remake of a 2000s movie was announced, but now it’s simply excessive. Studios are basically expected to recycle old ideas. Fortunately, people have caught on; they’ve begun to wonder when reboots, remakes, and sequels became the default. 

Nostalgia Is a Moneymaker 

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out why studios keep going back for seconds. A single box office failure costs them millions of dollars. So, studios automatically seek to minimize financial risks and guarantee an audience for each movie. Recognizable titles and characters are way more convincing than ones you’ve never seen before. Reboots reduce the pressure of persuading an audience that a story is worth their time. In other words, nostalgia is an economic safety net. 

An obvious example is The Walt Disney Studios, a nostalgia powerhouse. Disney has made some of the most iconic movies in the world, which means the hard part is done. Whenever money is tight, they pull out familiar faces: The Lion King, Moana, Tangled… All of them are frame-by-frame recreations with no particularly exciting factors, aside from tacky CGI and one new song. This makes me wonder: is creative restraint and stagnation the price to pay for the economic security of big-name studios?

Halle Bailey as Ariel in the Little Mermaid
Disney

If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It 

At the end of the day, many remakes are well made and beloved. The Parent Trap (1998), for example, has grown into an iconic classic without relying solely on nostalgia. It has charm, excellent performances, and stylish direction. Dune (2021) is another, more recent success, drastically surpassing the original version’s acting and special effects. Both of these films prioritized quality, which is lacking in the criticized media at hand.

What nags watchers most of the time is having their expectations obliterated. Many directors try to recreate things that were fine the way they were and end up stripping good stories of life. Take Fantastic Four (2015); it’s safe to say that nobody liked that movie. With a boring plot, rushed writing, and a depressing tone, the movie kept all the bad stuff and discarded the good. Alternatively, The Fantastic Four: First Steps came out ten years later and did great in theaters because it changed enough of the original story to stay interesting while maintaining that charm that fans already love. It comes down to knowing what audiences genuinely want instead of blindly picking out oldies. 

After watching Jurassic World Rebirth (2025) last year, I came to understand that there’s a pattern rooted in attachment. Yes, many franchises are deeply treasured (Star Wars, Fast and the Furious, Transformers, and many more), but, good God, it’s time to let things go. Stories come to an end, and that’s okay. Stretching it out only makes for bland characters and redundant storylines. In that same breath, not everything needs a modernized version of itself (I’m talking to you, Mean Girls).

The focus should be on creating new stories and characters that modern audiences can relate to. That’s why movies like Obsession (2025) did so well: it’s new, and it’s good! 

As a creative, it’s frustrating when more of the same shallow and dull work keeps appearing on the big screen. When driven by genuine creative interest and fresh perspectives, reboots can be revolutionary. Cinema should be a space for expression and innovation, where filmmakers work toward creating something meaningful, not profit alone. 

So the problem isn’t inherently the redoing, but the how and why. If there is nothing more to say with an existing story, then that’s an opportunity to make something never seen before.

Naimarys Barbot is a student at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez where she is majoring in Industrial Engineering. Aside from maths and technology, her love for music and reading has driven her to develop a deep passion for storytelling. From a very young age she has been working towards publishing her own series of fantasy books. Some other activities that she partakes in are: baking for her very own dessert business, rehearsing with the university's choir, and photography.
Constant learning is very important to her, always looking for opportunities and spaces in which she can grow. Working with Her Campus provides a creative outlet where she can share her own interest and opinions, as well as research new topics. A strong motivator for her is advocating against Artificial Intelligence. Her main goal is to keep literature and journalism alive in a society where creative effort is being repressed.