Her Campus Logo Her Campus Logo
Gossip Girl Blair Waldorf Shopping?width=1280&height=854&fit=crop&auto=webp&dpr=4
Gossip Girl Blair Waldorf Shopping?width=398&height=256&fit=crop&auto=webp&dpr=4
The CW
UFL | Style > Fashion

In Defense of Being “Overdressed”

Her Campus Placeholder Avatar
Charlize Andrews Student Contributor, University of Florida
This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at UFL chapter and does not reflect the views of Her Campus.

There is something curious about a culture that sells us endless ways to improve our appearance yet asks us where we are going the moment we look as though we have made an effort. A dress invites questions. A pair of heels suggests an occasion. Even a carefully chosen outfit can require an explanation, almost as if looking presentable on an ordinary afternoon is an eccentric thing to do.

The question “Why are you so dressed up?” usually accompanies an unspoken assumption: whatever you’re doing could not possibly warrant it. Somewhere in that question, getting dressed becomes getting overdressed. The distinction depends less on the clothes themselves and more on societal expectations. 

Those expectations are particularly curious, considering how extensively women’s clothing has been scrutinized throughout history. Looking appropriately dressed once involved conventions far more elaborate than choosing something suitable for dinner. The Metropolitan Museum of Art notes that gloves were worn for certain daytime and evening activities throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Additionally, the Victoria and Albert Museum (V&A) describes the corsets, crinolines, and bustles that shaped Victorian women’s silhouettes. These conventions varied by place and social class, but getting dressed could involve a meticulous negotiation with what society considered proper.

The gradual loosening of those conventions was consequential. The V&A connects less restrictive skirts in the 1890s with a growing interest in women’s physical freedom; comfort meant greater room to move through the world. There is little to mourn about losing an obligation to arrange oneself around exacting rules of appearance. Yet freedom to dress casually should also leave room to choose elegance. If women no longer need an excuse to dress down, why should dressing up require one?

A relaxed wardrobe can be liberating, especially on days when getting dressed feels like  another taxing obligation in an already crowded schedule. But for someone who enjoys fashion, choosing an outfit can be one of the day’s pleasures. A particular color, an unusual silhouette, or a familiar piece worn differently can add a sense of possibility to an otherwise ordinary day. The destination may be routine, but the experience of getting there need not feel quite so predictable.

Some research also suggests that clothing can influence how we approach a task. A 2015 study published in Social Psychological and Personality Science linked formal clothing with more abstract thinking, with a sense of power helping explain that relationship. This does not necessarily mean that dressing up makes us more productive, or that a favorite dress will improve a workday. However, it does offer a reason to more seriously consider the idea that clothing can matter to the person wearing it, beyond how it appears to everyone else.

“Presentable” remains a difficult word. It carries the residue of old judgments about who looks respectable, who belongs, and who can afford to participate. A woman in sweatpants owes nobody proof that she cares about herself. Factors like illness, money, disability, work, and the simple desire to be comfortable all shape what people wear. The pleasure of dressing up loses something when it becomes another standard women are expected to meet.

Fortunately, enjoying clothes does not require an expensive wardrobe or an hour in front of the mirror. A comfortable outfit can have color, proportion, texture, and personality. Sometimes, the pleasure is in earrings that catch the light, a shirt that falls exactly as you hoped, or shoes that finally bring an outfit together. These are small decisions, but small decisions can make a day feel more distinctly our own.

Occasions can heighten that pleasure. Dressing for a friend’s birthday dinner can be a way of participating in its celebration, of acknowledging that someone has made an occasion and we are pleased to be there. An outfit can express anticipation as readily as it expresses taste.

Ordinary life deserves some of that anticipation, too. Saving every beautiful thing for a future event leaves much of a wardrobe suspended in possibility. The dress waits for a reservation. The shoes wait for an invitation. Meanwhile, the days in which we actually live offer their own opportunities to wear something we love.

We have more latitude to decide what getting dressed will mean than the women who came before us. That freedom should make room for a little ceremony or alittle extravagance, even on days when neither is required. There is pleasure in choosing how to meet the world, and in letting an ordinary afternoon be worthy of an outfit we have been eager to wear.

The next time an outfit seems like too much, it might be worth asking: too much for what?

Charlize Andrews is an advertising student at the University of Florida with a love for fashion, writing, and all things fantasy. Outside of class, she spends her time working on creative projects, reading, and finding any excuse to dress up.