The USF Police Department has recently come under fire after revealing they intend to participate in ICE’s 287(g) task force program. Through this training, law enforcement officers will be authorized to perform “specified immigration officer functions under the agency’s direction and oversight”. This can include the interrogation and detainment of those suspected of immigration violations. While supporters argue the supposed improved public safety, critics warn about inevitable racial profiling and the erosion of trust between international/undocumented students and law enforcement.
Words can’t express how disappointed I am by this decision. As a university known for its large international student body, the lack of protection and care for them is abhorrent. Should the university choose to follow through with the program, life on campus will be forever changed. Students and staff alike from immigrant backgrounds will feel unsafe and targeted, hindering their educational experience. Additionally, the presence of immigration enforcement would hinder public safety. With individuals fearing the possibility of detainment, they may deter from reporting crime.
Moreover, it should be made clear that USF’s choice to include themselves in this program is completely optional. Contrary to popular belief, nobody forced USF to sign-up for this training, at least not publicly. In the case of coercion or external pressure, it’s my belief students and staff are entitled to complete transparency regarding these matters. No university, politician, or sponsor should be allowed to bully their students; we will not stand for it.
The disdain towards this decision within the USF community has been loud and clear. Emphasis on maintaining educational institutions as safe spaces for all students has been at the forefront of opposing the 287(g) agreement. I do find it interesting that USF has been quick to shut down criticism regarding this partnership and its effects on certain demographics, while scorning students who exercise their 1st amendment right when protesting the ongoing genocide in Gaza. USF’s recent choices reflect a clear shift in our nation’s leadership, and I’m ashamed to say they haven’t fought against it. Catering to certain political parties’ ideals goes directly against what education is meant to be: a place to flourish.
As discussions continue, it’s crucial for USF to consider the broader implications of such an agreement. Engaging with students, faculty, and community stakeholders will be essential in making an informed decision that upholds the university’s commitment to safety, inclusivity, and academic freedom.