Her Campus Logo Her Campus Logo
mario calvo S mEIfXRzIk unsplash?width=1280&height=854&fit=crop&auto=webp&dpr=4
mario calvo S mEIfXRzIk unsplash?width=398&height=256&fit=crop&auto=webp&dpr=4
/ Unsplash
South Carolina | Culture > News

SC Legislators Seek to Redefine Marriage

Her Campus Placeholder Avatar
Kelsey Norris Student Contributor, University of South Carolina
Bri Hamlin Student Contributor, University of South Carolina
This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at South Carolina chapter and does not reflect the views of Her Campus.

Six South Carolina legislators are attempting to change the legal status of same-sex marriage in South Carolina.

The Marriage and Constitution Restoration Act,Ā if enacted into law, would define any marriage not between one man and one woman as a ā€˜parody marriage’ and prevent such marriages from being legally recognized by the state. The proposed bill argues that marriage between one man and one woman is secular and ā€œnatural, neutral and noncontroversial, unlike parody forms of marriageā€. Same-sex marriages are defined as religious due to sexual orientation being a ā€œmatter of faithā€. As South Carolina is prohibited by the First Amendment from favoring any one religion, the bill’s authors claim that any legal recognition of same-sex marriage or distribution of information about same-sex marriage in public schools is unconstitutional.

The bill fails to recognize that marriage is a cultural institution, not a natural occurrence. Various cultures have different definitions of marriage and different practices associated with it, so to allege that heterosexual and monogamous marriage is the natural default is incorrect. Same-sex married couples can be found in any religion or culture, so to define same-sex marriage as a separate religion is also wrong.

The authors go beyond attacking same-sex marriages to discrediting all non-heterosexual identities. Sexual orientation is explicitly defined as ā€œa self-asserted sex-based identityā€ based on ā€œunproven faith-based assumptionsā€. Essentially, the bill would put into law the definition of sexual orientation as a choice unsupported by science and ā€œobsceneā€. The Marriage and Constitution Restoration Act not only endangers the legal status of same-sex marriages, but the legal status of anyone who identifies as LGBT+.

Such a bill promotes misconceptions about sexual orientation and would lead to further discrimination against the LGBT+ community. The bill authors argue that South Carolina recognizing same-sex marriage has led to increased persecution of non-observers. These six legislators clearly don’t understand what persecution is. Persecution is 30% of openly LGBT peopleĀ experiencing discrimination in the workplace. Persecution is 61% of LGBT+ studentsĀ who have been victimized at school not reporting the incident to school staff out of fear. Persecution is being deemed a parody of normal people.

The representatives sponsoring the bill are Steven Wayne Long, William M. ā€œBillā€ Chumley,Ā James Mikell ā€œMikeā€ Burns, John R. McCravy, III, Josiah Magnuson andĀ  Richard ā€œRickā€ Martin.

To take action, find and contact your representative at the South Carolina State House’s website.

Bri Hamlin

South Carolina '19

Hello, it's Bri (to the tune of Adele please). I am a senior at USC Columbia and am not currently thirty, flirty, and thriving, but twenty-one, anxious, and trying will sure do.