Her Campus Logo Her Campus Logo
Pitt | Culture > News

Aliens In The White House?

Mahati Periyala Student Contributor, University of Pittsburgh
This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at Pitt chapter and does not reflect the views of Her Campus.

We’ve been imagining an alien invasion all wrong. There were no UFOs, no mysterious lights — just a donor reception and a room full of people who looked as though aging had violated their nondisclosure agreements.

The online reaction to Susan Dell’s White House appearance made that image explicit: commenters described her as “alien” or “reptilian,” turning her appearance into a spectacle. But placing Dell alongside figures such as Elon Musk in this discussion raises a question larger than how any individual looks.

The extraterrestrials in this story are entirely metaphorical. What interests me is not whether the people running the country come from another planet, but why the description is accurate: a ruling class increasingly invested in looking untouched by the ordinary conditions of human life.

Consider “Mar-a-Lago face,” the unflattering nickname for an aesthetic associated with parts of Donald Trump’s orbit: prominent cheeks, full lips, sharply defined brows, bright white teeth, and a highly polished, minimally expressive finish. It’s a media label, and certainly not a description of every Republican. But it’s become recognizable enough to generate its own coverage and commentary. 

What makes this aesthetic feel alien is not any single feature, but the impression of a face from which uncertainty, age, and vulnerability have been carefully removed. 

But appearance alone cannot tell us whether someone is compassionate, detached, or fit to govern. The more useful criticism concerns the culture surrounding the look, what it rewards, whose approval it seeks, and how beauty becomes entangled with wealth and political belonging.

There is nothing inherently reactionary about Botox, cosmetic surgery, makeup, or wanting to look good. Nobody owes the public wrinkles as proof of moral character. And a political critique that turns into a competition to humiliate women’s faces is neither especially original nor especially brave.

The more interesting question is what an appearance communicates inside a culture of power.

Reporting on Mar-a-Lago face has described the look not merely as a beauty preference, but as a possible signal of wealth, status, and belonging within Trump’s political world. That distinction matters. In that reading, the face is not simply personal. It is a membership card.

Yet, this is not exclusively a MAGA story. Move from the political donor circuit to the technology elite, and there are similar patterns. 

Some ultra-wealthy technology figures are putting substantial money into longevity research. Jeff Bezos has been reported as an investor in Altos Labs, whose work focuses on cellular rejuvenation; Sam Altman has backed Retro Biosciences. These projects concern biology and potential medical treatments, not simply cosmetic appearance, and shouldn’t be confused with proof that anyone has conquered aging.

Cosmetic enhancement and longevity research are not equivalent. What connects them in this argument is the aspiration to exert increasing control over aging, and the question of what happens when that control becomes a privilege of wealth. 

To be clear, research that improves health in later life could benefit enormous numbers of people. The objection isn’t to healthier aging; it’s to the fantasy that wealth should purchase an exemption from the human bargain.

Here is where the alien metaphor becomes more revealing than the appearance jokes. The defining characteristic of an extraterrestrial ruling class would not be unusual skin. It would be estrangement: the inability to inhabit the same reality as the people below.

That estrangement becomes politically consequential when the people making decisions are insulated from the conditions those decisions create. The issue isn’t whether they look unfamiliar, but whether ordinary insecurity remains comprehensible to them.

That’s the distance worth examining. Not a person’s natural features. Not the fact that someone has had cosmetic work. Not the ordinary wish to remain attractive. The target is the performance of invulnerability: the suggestion that enough money, discipline, access, and intervention can lift a person out of the common human predicament.

Mar-a-Lago face makes a useful symbol because its visual language is so emphatic. Everything appears controlled, heightened, and polished. And democracy, inconveniently, is made of unapproved moments. People age. Bodies change. Voters ask uncomfortable questions. Other people’s needs interrupt the schedule.

A political culture should be able to tolerate those things without treating them as defects to be corrected.

So no, the argument is not that aliens have occupied the White House. It’s that the alien invasion joke offers a surprisingly efficient way to describe power that has become unfamiliar in ordinary life.

I don’t need leaders who look exactly like me. I need leaders who understand that the rest of us are not background characters in their quest for permanent youth, permanent wealth, and permanent control.

The most unsettling thing about the ruling class isn’t that it sometimes looks otherworldly. It’s the suspicion that, given the choice, it would rather stop being human than start being accountable.

Mahati is a first year at the University of Pittsburgh studying Molecular Biology. In her free time, she enjoys watching movies, walking the city, and reading.