At the end of July 2026, Brazilians were confronted with news that several exports to the United States would face a new 12.5% tariff. But with Brazil heading into an election year, the dispute goes beyond trade and diplomacy. As the country prepares to elect its president, governors, members of Congress, and senators in October, the tariffs could put pressure on key economic sectors and become an important issue in the electoral debate.
What are these tariffs?
To understand the dispute, it is first important to understand what a tariff is. A tariff is a tax imposed on imported goods. By making foreign products more expensive, they can give locally produced goods a price advantage and are often used as a tool to protect domestic industries.
But the diplomatic rift, however, is tied to a specific U.S. investigation into forced labor in global supply chains. In March 2026, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) launched investigations into 60 economies, including Brazil, examining whether they had failed to impose and effectively enforce bans on imports of goods produced with forced labor. According to the U.S. government, these practices could give foreign producers an artificial cost advantage and therefore burden or restrict U.S. commerce.
For Brazil, this measure is separate from another U.S. action announced in July: a 25% Section 301 tariff on certain Brazilian goods, which the USTR said was the result of a separate investigation into what it characterized as Brazil’s “unreasonable” acts, policies and practices.
This distinction is important because the tariffs affecting Brazilian exports are the result of different U.S. investigations and legal mechanisms, rather than a single blanket tariff imposed for one reason.
How would this affect Brazilians?
One important characteristic of Brazil’s export economy is that the country exports in order to import. In other words, most of the products Brazil exports are raw materials and/or commodities, which are then transformed into products and subsequently become goods that can be bought and sold around the world.
Therefore, although tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods, in practice, American importers may pass part of the additional costs on to Brazilian companies, consumers, or suppliers.
In addition, a higher tariff may make a Brazilian product more expensive and less competitive in the U.S. market. For companies that depend on exports to the United States, finding buyers in other countries may be an alternative, but this transition does not happen immediately.
The effects are already raising concerns across sectors of the Brazilian economy. Estimates released by the Federal Senate indicate that losses could reach R$14 billion, along with the possibility of more than 50,000 jobs being lost.
When it became mixed with political propaganda
The dispute took on a political dimension when President Donald Trump linked the pressure on Brazil to the judicial proceedings against former President Jair Bolsonaro.
In an official document, the Trump administration described Bolsonaro’s treatment by Brazilian authorities as a threat to Brazil’s political institutions and referred to the proceedings as a “witch hunt.” Trump has repeatedly defended Bolsonaro and criticized the case against him.
Brazil responded by combining diplomatic negotiations with preparations for possible trade countermeasures. The government activated its Economic Reciprocity Law, which allows Brazil to respond to trade measures considered harmful to its interests, while emphasizing that negotiation remained the priority.
The tariffs also became part of Brazil’s domestic political debate. Senator Flávio Bolsonaro argued against the proposed U.S. tariffs, saying they could ultimately benefit President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva politically and strengthen Brazil’s ties with China.
The episode shows how the tariff dispute quickly expanded beyond trade, becoming intertwined with Brazil’s political divisions and the 2026 elections.
How Does All of This Relate to the Elections?
Brazil is entering an election year with President Lula seeking reelection and several candidates presenting themselves as alternatives. In this environment, Brazil’s relationship with the United States and Trump’s decisions have become part of the domestic political debate.
For Lula’s government, rejecting the tariffs can be presented as a matter of national sovereignty: Brazil should not accept foreign pressure over its political or judicial decisions.
The opposition, however, can use the dispute to question the government’s foreign policy and its ability to maintain strategic trade relations with the United States.
Presidential candidates have already entered the debate. Goiás Governor and presidential candidate Ronaldo Caiado, for example, criticized the possibility of Brazil retaliating against the United States, arguing that such a move would be inappropriate.
Trump’s actions could even have an unintended political effect. Instead of weakening Lula, pressure from the United States could strengthen his image as a defender of Brazilian sovereignty. At the same time, the dispute reinforces Brazil’s political polarization, as Trump maintains ties with sectors aligned with Bolsonaro while Lula’s government uses the conflict to emphasize the need to resist foreign interference.
Sovereignty and the Economy
The tariffs leave Brazil facing a difficult choice. Retaliating could demonstrate political strength and uphold the principle of reciprocity, but escalating the dispute could hurt Brazilian companies that depend on the U.S. market.
The government has therefore emphasized negotiations while seeking to diversify Brazil’s export destinations and reduce dependence on a single trading partner.
In an election year, however, economic consequences quickly become political arguments. The dispute is no longer only about how much Brazilian products will cost in the United States. It has also raised a broader question: should Brazil respond to external pressure with confrontation, negotiation, or a combination of both?
The article above was edited by Rafaela Navarro.
Liked this type of content? Check Her Campus Casper Libero home page for more!