The name Edward Theodore Gein, the infamous “Butcher of Plainfield”, echoes as the precursor of modern horror in Hollywood. But his story is far more than a list of grotesque crimes — it is a complex study of the fragility of the human mind and the devastating effects of social isolation.
Born in 1906 in Wisconsin, Gein endured a childhood dominated by his mother, Augusta, a religious fanatic who instilled in him and his brother a hatred of women and a fear of sin. This constant oppression, coupled with an absence of social contact, laid the fertile ground for the schizophrenia that would consume him.
The death of Augusta in 1945 meant the loss of Gein’s only emotional anchor, plunging him into pathological grief. He preserved his mother’s bedroom as a shrine and soon began a series of acts of desecration and violence, culminating in the exhumation of female corpses from local cemeteries. His obsession was clear: to recreate or embody the lost maternal figure.
When he was captured in 1957, after murdering store owner Bernice Worden, the discoveries on his farm shocked the world and forced psychiatry to confront the depths of human evil. Masks, utensils, and “suits” made from human skin revealed the extent of his delusion. Declared legally insane, Gein spent the rest of his life in psychiatric institutions, where he died in 1984.
“Monster: The Story of Ed Gein”
The new season of the Netflix anthology series created by Ryan Murphy and Ian Brennan revisits the case through a more analytical lens. The casting of Charlie Hunnam as Ed Gein was a strategic choice: the actor sought to portray a monster who is, above all, a victim of his own illness and isolation. His performance was praised for conveying an eerie childlike quality, inspired by historical research and a recreation of Gein’s “infantile” voice.
However, the series sparked an intense ethical debate. While the creators claim their intent was to “explain” Gein through the lens of trauma, schizophrenia, and isolation — even comparing him to the prototype of the modern “incel” — many critics accused the show of dangerously romanticizing the serial killer.
The narrative itself, though, attempts to anticipate these critiques through a meta-commentary on true crime culture. By focusing on Gein’s hallucinations and on how his story was transformed into entertainment, the series poses a central question — summarized by Hunnam’s reflection:
“Is Ed Gein the monster of the show, or are we the monsters for watching?”.
This reflection shifts the focus of horror from the criminal to society’s collective fascination with violence, turning the viewer into a complicit witness.
In essence, Ed Gein’s journey — from a traumatized man on an isolated Wisconsin farm to a cultural symbol of evil — remains a disturbing reminder of how neglect, mental illness, and obsession can converge to create real monsters that both shape and haunt fiction.
The Psychopath Paradigm in Cinema
The figure of Ed Gein transcended real crime to become a dark, recurring symbol in cinema. His macabre acts — grave robbing, occasional cannibalism, and the use of human remains to craft household objects — revealed a deeply disturbed mind and gave birth to a new archetype of the modern villain: the introspective psychopath, scarred by familial trauma and, most notably, the oppressive maternal figure.
This psychological and aesthetic template inspired a lineage of characters that defined psychological and slasher horror from the 1960s onward. Among them, three stand out as direct heirs to Gein’s mythology:
Norman Bates (Psycho, 1960)
The first and most influential of these archetypes. Created by Robert Bloch and immortalized by Alfred Hitchcock, Norman embodies the duality between repressed gentleness and explosive violence. Living in isolation with the memory — and the corpse — of his mother, he represents the terror of split identity and Oedipal obsession, both central elements drawn from the Gein case.
Leatherface (The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, 1974)
While Norman represents the horror of a divided mind, Leatherface is the physical manifestation of insanity. Cannibalism, the grotesque aesthetics of rural America, and a mask made of human skin elevate horror to its most visceral expression. Though less psychological, Leatherface deepened Gein’s legacy by portraying the mutilated body as fetish and the home as a chamber of torture.
Buffalo Bill (The Silence of the Lambs, 1991)
The most disturbing of the three. He seeks to literally transform into a woman, sewing a “suit” made from the skin of his victims. This extreme representation of the desire for metamorphosis and denial of identity is an even more grotesque interpretation of Gein’s practice of creating female garments to “become his mother.”
Beyond these icons, Gein’s influence echoes through lesser-known yet significant works, such as Deranged: Confessions of a Necrophile (1974) — a semi-documentary dramatization of his crimes — and Ed Gein (2000), a more direct and psychological portrayal of the historical figure.
More than half a century after his death, Ed Gein remains the ghostly founder of modern horror — not only for his brutal acts, but for the sick symbolism he left imprinted on the collective imagination.
His story forces us to confront the blurred boundary between real and fictional horror, between the criminal and the audience that consumes him.
_______________________
The article above was edited by Helena Maluf
Liked this type of content? Check Her Campus Cásper Libero home page for more!