Back in 2014, when I was still a lowly high school student, I went to the local Cinema Center and purchased one student discount ticket for âOuija.â Produced by Hasbro (the makers of the overpriced Ouija boards you can find in the back of Barnes & Noble), the movie stars a bunch of clueless teens who accidentally open a portal to Hell and summon a demon. Typical Tuesday, you know?
Needless to say, the film was an absolute waste of money. I got more entertainment out of picking popcorn kernels out from between my teeth. âOuijaâ became the movie, the one that convinced me that modern commercial horror movies were, for the most part, not at all worth my money.
Take a look at the timelessness of the early âFriday the 13thâ installments, or the campy horror of the âA Nightmare on Elm Streetâ franchise. And how many of you wouldnât recognize the Chucky dolls glowering down from shelves at Spencerâs? These older horror films didnât have the budgets that their modern remakes do, and didnât have Hasbro funnelling money into uninspired PG-13 cash grabs.
YouTube film critic Ralph Sepe Jr., known otherwise by his screen name âRalphTheMovieMaker,â celebrated Halloween 2018 with a comprehensive review of every film in the âFriday the 13thâ franchise. As he ran through the movies chronologically by release, he found the scores fell the further he went. The 2009 remake of the original earned only a 3/10 (two points for nudity, one for kills, and zero for entertainment). His reasoning reflects my exact reasoning for why modern horror movies just arenât doing it for me:
“Itâs a modern day studio version of âFriday the 13th,â and thatâs why itâs boring,â Sepe said. âItâs got jumpscares, it looks fine, everythingâs dark and brown and yellow. Itâs fine, I guess, itâs competent. But thereâs no style to it; itâs not entertaining.â
For me, the beauty of older horror movies comes from the graininess of the camera, the grit of the practical effects, the old and somewhat scratchy music that accompanies scenes of intense terror. Modern horror flicks rely on jumpscare tactics. Even âUnfriended,â which uses Skype video conversations to simulate the experience of being trapped on the computer in a deadly game, uses iMovie stingers at key moments of horror. It ruins the immersion and ultimately cheapens the experience.
Recently, I went to a free screening of âTruth or Dare,â a movie so similar to âOuijaâ that were it not for the ridiculous Snapchat filter after-effects used to make characters, er, âcreepy,â I would be mixing the two films up. âTruth or Dareâ is just as lifeless as âOuija,â but worsens the blow by incorporating a gay character whose sole purpose is to spend every scene explaining to us that heâs gay. Whatâs with the sudden need to politicize horror? We already live in a political hellscape, let me see people getting chopped with a machete. I deserve a little fun, donât I?
Older horror films donât worry themselves with any agenda besides killing characters and scaring the audience. Thereâs nothing I love more than a good death scene; all the added drama and cringe-tastic romance padding out the story just make it boring.
That’s not to say all contemporary horror movies are bad. âRawâ is a French-Belgian film that uses hyper-stylized settings and buckets upon buckets of (fake) blood to tell a thrilling and chilling tale of a vegetarian who develops an addiction to eating raw flesh of animals and humans. The drama interspersed with the horror never overstays its welcome, and always manages to tie back into the overarching horror plot.
Commercial horror movies are far too focused on making money to actually be scary. Every stinger, every pan of the camera to reveal someone lurking over the protagonistâs shoulder (usually just a friend), every knife to the chest or axe to the head just feels lifeless.
That’s enough complaining for now. Iâm going back to my coffin. Donât wake me up until horror movies are scary again, alright?