Her Campus Logo Her Campus Logo
PSU | Culture

In Defense Of Lady Macbeth

Shreya Iyengar Student Contributor, Pennsylvania State University
This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at PSU chapter and does not reflect the views of Her Campus.

Everybody loves to blame Lady Macbeth from “Macbeth” by William Shakespeare. She is often reduced to a manipulative, power-hungry wife who drove her husband to murder. At its core, “Macbeth” explores unchecked ambition, the relationship between power and morality and guilt and its psychological consequences. 

The Defense

Lady Macbeth is often positioned as the primary instigator of Duncan’s murder, but this simplifies the dynamic between her and Macbeth.

Macbeth’s ambition exists prior to her involvement. His letter reveals not only the witches’ prophecy but his own fixation on it. Lady Macbeth does not introduce the idea of power; she recognizes and accelerates it.

Their relationship is explicitly framed as a partnership. Macbeth refers to her as his “dearest partner of greatness,” suggesting shared ambition rather than manipulation. Her role is not to control him but to provide the decisiveness he severely lacks.

Her famous plea to be “unsexed” further complicates her characterization. Rather than signaling inherent cruelty, it reveals the opposite: she must actively suppress her compassion to act. This is reinforced by her inability to kill Duncan herself when he resembles her father. Her ambition is therefore not limitless; emotional and moral boundaries constrain it.

Another important aspect of Lady Macbeth’s role is how she manages Macbeth’s instability. After Duncan’s murder, Macbeth begins to unravel almost immediately. He fixates on the voices he hears and his hallucinations as he panics over what he has done. 

In both moments, Lady Macbeth intervenes to control the situation. She dismisses his visions as temporary fits, reassures the guests and works to maintain the appearance of normalcy. This is not the behavior of someone detached from the consequences of their actions, but of someone actively trying to protect someone they love. 

Her descent into madness demonstrates not the absence of conscience but its overwhelming presence. She fails to repress the guilt that was always there. Her suicide is not simply an escape, but the culmination of psychological collapse. She tries to override her humanity and is ultimately destroyed by the effort.

“Grey’s Anatomy” And Its Parallels

The perfect modern parallel to Lady Macbeth can be found in Cristina Yang from “Grey’s Anatomy.”

Yang, like Lady Macbeth, operates in a highly competitive, male-dominated field of cardiac surgery. She prioritizes excellence, suppresses emotional vulnerability and aligns herself with traditionally masculine definitions of success. This reflects what is often described as the “unsex me” archetype: the idea that women must shed conventional femininity to access power.

Her relationship with Preston Burke, Chief Cardiothoracic Surgeon, further parallels the Macbeth dynamic. Cristina, an intern at the time, is deeply invested in Burke’s success — not purely out of self-interest but out of admiration for his brilliance. Her ambition is intertwined with his, much like Lady Macbeth’s is with Macbeth’s.

The storyline involving Burke’s hand injury offers a strong parallel to Lady Macbeth’s role in “Macbeth.” Burke initially chooses to hide his tremor, just as Macbeth independently entertains the idea of murder, but Yang becomes complicit in sustaining the deception. She pushes Burke to return to surgery after he is shot and assists him in all of his operations.

Her motivation, however, is not purely opportunistic. Throughout the arc, she is visibly anxious and repeatedly urges him to slow down. Yang reacts with fear during operations when his condition threatens patient safety, and she isn’t able to help him. Her actions are driven as much by fear as by ambition — specifically, fear of losing the image of Burke as a perfect surgeon, which reflects her own insecurities about competence and control.

Her suggestion that “no one has to know” and that consequences will eventually fade echoes Lady Macbeth’s insistence that thinking too deeply about wrongdoing leads to madness. 

Much like Lady Macbeth, Cristina does not initiate the wrongdoing but reinforces it, convincing both herself and Burke that continuing is necessary. However, the psychological toll becomes increasingly apparent: her stress manifests physically, and her eventual confession to the Chief of Surgery marks her breaking point. 

Yang, like Lady Macbeth, shares partial responsibility for the escalation of the situation, but her role is better understood as sustaining an already unstable decision rather than creating it.

However, Yang exists in a world that allows her to pursue ambition directly. She can choose her career over her relationship and maintain autonomy. Lady Macbeth, by contrast, is confined to acting through her husband. Her identity and ambitions are inseparable from his trajectory, leaving her with no independent path once the system begins to collapse.

So, in defense of Lady Macbeth, she was never the most dangerous character in the play; she was the most honest about what it takes to gain power.

Hi! I'm Shreya, a senior at Penn State studying Math with a minor in Economics. I love discovering new music, getting invested in movies and TV shows and, of course, writing. I hope you enjoy reading all the thoughts racing in my head!