Her Campus Logo Her Campus Logo
PSU | Wellness > Sex + Relationships

What You Take In Relationships Vs Friendships

Shreya Iyengar Student Contributor, Pennsylvania State University
This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at PSU chapter and does not reflect the views of Her Campus.

Your tolerance for bullshit in a relationship triples. Have you noticed?

The same behaviors that would immediately stand out as disrespectful or exhausting in a friend — or worse, in a friend’s partner — somehow become acceptable, or at least explainable, when they come from someone we’re attracted to. All sensibility gets thrown out the window the second you’re into someone.

In friendships, the expectations are straightforward. You expect consistency, honesty and a sense of ease. If a friend repeatedly ignores you, makes you feel anxious or only shows up when it’s convenient for them, it doesn’t take long to recognize that something is off.

You don’t sit there decoding their behavior or assigning meaning to every interaction. You see it for what it is, and you respond: creating distance or a confrontation. There’s a kind of clarity in friendships that feels grounded and rational.

That clarity tends to disappear in non-platonic situations. 

Late replies, mixed signals and inconsistency suddenly invite analysis instead of conclusions. Instead of thinking, “This doesn’t feel good,” the response becomes, “What does this mean?”

You start filling in gaps, justifying behavior and giving the benefit of the doubt far more generously than you would in any platonic relationship. Red flags aren’t necessarily ignored, but they’re edited into something more digestible: misunderstandings, personality traits, temporary phases.

Even if it’s not serious, why are you tolerating things you wouldn’t accept from a friend?

Your friends see it immediately. They’ll have 10 different opinions about him based on the same “weird behaviors” you’re trying to rationalize.

If they know you well enough, they can tell when you’re leaving parts out, when you’re softening the story to make it sound better than it actually is. But when they point things out, the response is almost automatic:

“You don’t understand him like I do.”
“It’s different this time.”
“No, you don’t get it…it’s actually kind of cute.”

Why are we more willing to extend grace to someone who is inconsistent and unclear simply because there’s attraction involved? Why does a romantic connection feel like it deserves more patience, more understanding, more time to “figure itself out,” when a friendship would never be given that same leniency?

Part of it might be attachment. The way we show up with friends is usually secure, grounded and familiar. But with someone we’re interested in, that can shift. You become more aware, more reactive, more willing to hold on to potential instead of reality.

It also creates a kind of attachment that isn’t always grounded in reality. You’re not just responding to the person in front of you, but to the version of them you’ve imagined, which makes it harder to be objective.

There’s also a subtle imbalance in how we measure investment. In many cases, we end up giving more patience and understanding to someone who has invested far less in us than our friends have.

Friends show up consistently, offer support and build a sense of stability over time. Yet, they’re held to a higher standard, while romantic interests are often given more room to be inconsistent or unclear. It raises the question of why we’re willing to give in situations that have given us less.

Another factor is the way we perceive loss. That perception of losing a romantic connection can make us hold on longer than we should, tolerating behavior we would otherwise reject. It becomes less about whether something feels right and more about not wanting to let go of the possibility of what it could be.

Over time, though, there’s usually a moment of clarity. Looking back, it becomes easier to see the situation for what it was, without the influence of attraction. The questions that once felt complicated start to seem simple. You realize that the confusion wasn’t coming from a lack of understanding, but from a willingness to overlook things you already recognized as unacceptable in any other context.

If you stay in a relationship for way longer than you should or keep replying to text messages from someone you should have blocked simply because they’re hot, you’re not alone. As much consolation as it may be, if you keep repeating the same patterns of finding certain qualities attractive, you’re simply operating with lower standards than you should. 

Expectations should be set. 

Priorities should be clear. 

And you shouldn’t lie to yourself about your expectations or your priorities.

Shreya Iyengar is a third year student studying Math with a minor in Economics at Penn State University. When she's not writing, she enjoys exploring downtown coffee shops or listening to music.