Her Campus Logo Her Campus Logo
Queen's U | Culture

Happy Women Don’t Chart, Apparently

Mannat Mehra Student Contributor, Queen's University
This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at Queen's U chapter and does not reflect the views of Her Campus.

There’s a pattern in pop music that’s hard to ignore once you see it: female artists are at their most celebrated when they’re heartbroken, unraveling, or publicly suffering. Breakup albums dominate charts, angry anthems become cultural moments, and pain is praised as “raw,” “real” and “authentic.” But the moment a woman in music seems content—stable relationship, emotional peace, joy—her work is suddenly labeled as boring, unserious or worse: a flop.

Sadness, it seems, has become the unofficial prerequisite for female artistic credibility.

Look at the reception. Olivia Rodrigo’s GUTS, still mining teenage rage and romantic devastation, kept her firmly in the cultural conversation. Sabrina Carpenter’s Short n’ Sweet dominated 2024, but a huge part of its success unfolded amid highly publicized relationship discourse and songs like “Taste” that leaned into romantic chaos. Taylor Swift’s The Tortured Poets Department became her most-streamed album in a single day, dissected endlessly for coded breakup references and emotional wreckage. These projects are brilliant but they also reinforce a familiar pattern. We treat women’s pain as the pinnacle of their artistry.

Then there’s what happens when the narrative shifts. When Taylor released Lover, an album centered on commitment and contentment, at the time of its release, it was criticized as a ‘cliche-ridden waste of time’ . Ariana Grande’s Sweetener, created during a period of new love, was dismissed as unfocused while thank u, next, born from grief and a very public breakup, was immediately canonized. Billie Eilish’s Happier Than Ever explored growth and emotional clarity, yet the songs that dominated conversation were the angriest ones; quiet reflection was overshadowed by rage.

In this landscape, happiness is rarely framed as a progression. More often, it’s treated as a pause. Still, there are signs that this expectation may not be as fixed as it once was.

Olivia Dean’s The Art of Loving, released in 2025, offers a compelling counterexample. The album is warm, intimate, and intentionally restrained, centering emotional security, platonic care, and sustainable love. Rather than dramatizing instability, Dean writes from a place of clarity, allowing intimacy to exist without spectacle. Songs like Nice To Each Other linger in the quiet steadiness of mutual care, while I’ve Seen It unfolds as a reflective ballad about observing love in all its forms; in family, in friends and in the world around us, capturing love’s quiet, everyday moments rather than dramatic emotional collapse

What makes The Art of Loving particularly notable is its reception. The album earned major industry recognition during the 2025–26 awards cycle and marked a clear expansion of Dean’s mainstream visibility. Its success suggested that audiences are not inherently resistant to joy, they are simply less accustomed to seeing it framed as artistically significant when it comes from women.

Even so, Dean’s trajectory still feels like an exception. For every artist whose turn toward stability is rewarded, there are many more whose work is met with indifference once the turmoil subsides.

What’s striking is how rarely this rule applies to male artists. Harry Styles released Harry’s House, an album steeped in domestic bliss and emotional ease, and it swept major awards. Ed Sheeran has built an empire on earnest love songs without his depth ever being questioned. Bad Bunny’s Un Verano Sin Ti was sun-soaked, carefree joy and one of the biggest albums of its year. Men are allowed emotional range without consequence. Their peace isn’t treated as proof they’ve run out of things to say.

The internet supercharges this dynamic. Fans increasingly feel entitled to emotional access, treating female artists less like musicians and more like friends going through something. When a woman writes from pain, audiences feel closer to her. When she heals, when she stops narrating her trauma, fans feel disconnected, even betrayed. The parasocial relationship fractures.

This is where “flop era” discourse thrives. Katy Perry’s Smile, an album about choosing joy and motherhood, was widely mocked. Miley Cyrus’s Younger Now, her attempt at grounded happiness, was largely ignored. Even Charli XCX’s Crash, which leaned into fun and irony, was dismissed as less serious until BRAT in 2024 returned her to emotional chaos and earned renewed critical fervor.

The pattern proves that stability doesn’t trend the way heartbreak does.There’s an industry incentive at play here too. Heartbreak is easy to market, easy to meme, easy to turn into narrative. Albums become storylines: who hurt her, when, and how badly. Female artists aren’t just musicians, they’re characters in an ongoing drama, and sadness keeps the plot moving.

The problem isn’t that women write about pain. Some of the most influential albums of the last decade were born from it. But when pain becomes the primary condition under which women are allowed to be taken seriously, something is lost. Joy is not a creative failure, it’s a human experience worth exploring just as deeply as loss. Olivia Dean’s recent success complicates a long-standing assumption in pop culture, that suffering is the most credible form of expression available to women. The real question is whether her reception signals a shift, or whether happiness will continue to be treated as an exception rather than an evolution.

Mannat is a fourth-year Economics major at Queen’s University and this year’s Co-Chair. A professional overthinker and sworn enemy of early mornings, she spends her free time daydreaming about the short film she’s definitely making soon, baking treats to share, and, most of all, writing, always writing.