Flashback to 2016, when the movie Moana was all the rave. In response to its popularity, Disney did what it always does: release costumes of the main characters just in time for Halloween. Except, the Maui costume did not include just his clothes or accessories, but his brown, tattooed skin. Yeah. Let’s talk about it.Â
According to The Washington Post, the costume received mixed reviews. While many Pacific Islanders were appalled that their identity was being commercialized and appropriated so flippantly, others shrugged it off as “not a big deal,” considering it was representing a specific character and not an entire culture.Â
With all these different opinions, how do we decide which costumes are permissible and which ones aren’t?
Trends like blackface and Native American headdresses have been widely denounced, but less obvious costumes are also being called into question. Ninja, gypsy, geisha and DĂa de Muertos costumes used to be Halloween go-to’s, but recently, people have condemned them for perpetuating harmful clichĂ©s and contributing to the erasure of their cultural significance. In 2004, a school district in Washington State went as far as to completely abstain from celebrating Halloween, claiming that stereotypical depictions of the holiday were offensive to those practicing Wiccan and Pagan religions.Â
Even for social justice warriors, it may seem extreme to restrict Halloween costumes to this extent. The United States is a multiracial nation and is constantly being shaped by different ethnic influences, so it’s reasonable for people to glean inspiration from various cultures. However, while the distinction between culturally appropriative and appreciative attitudes can be fairly clear in conversation, it’s less easy to discern just from someone’s costume. You never know who you might come across on Halloween, so when deciding what you’re going to dress up as, it might be best to avoid anything that even has you questioning whether it’s okay or not.Â